Subject	Well, that's not quite true
Posted by	Good2Zya on January 30, 2001 at 10:07 PM
	This message has been viewed 12 times.
In Reply To	Without SERIOUS rear end suspension work, Z's DO NOT hook up posted by BadZCar (FL) on January 30, 2001 at 09:47 PM
Message	But no, the Z's suspension was not designed for drag racing, but it's not horrible for it either. Kyle's car is a good example. With the exception of an NA rear end and some springs, his was stock, including shocks. Like any other high powered car, without slicks, or at least drag radials, you are going to spin at the track. Also, I'm sure anyone that has run at a track finds it to be much slicker than being on the street. Hell, I chirped my tires going to 4th. I've never done that on any street Fred 95 300TT SGP Stage..Who knows..lol Dynoed 539.4 RWHP, 481.2 Lbs. Torque Pump Gas @ 17 Lbs. of Boost NO NOS!!
Follow Ups	SCC has a 539rwHP Z that only does 12.95. Seems slow 2 me. (n/m) - teahead 16:26:46 01/30/01 Same as Fred's ( SGP ), they took it easy,,LOL. (n/m) - ZBlacktt 16:35:47 01/30/01 that seems slow did thay push it the first half LOL (n/m) - NONE 16:43:13 01/30/01 that is really not that quick for that type of horespower - gtclk 17:07:31 01/30/01 Yes,I did have some wheel hop. I must address the suspension (n/m) - Good2Zya 19:15:11 01/30/01 I think he's talking about Fred's car in SCC (n/m) - wesman [92TT-less ] 18:10:51 01/30/01 I think you right, I was thinking White TT,,,,,,LOL. - ZBlacktt 22:36:38 01/30/01 Can you say "No traction" Look at the MPH for the real power (n/m) - TwinTurboPete 16:42:37 01/30/01 True 12.95 spinning is pretty quick. (n/m) - NONE 16:45:54 01/30/01 Yes, Fred's was still over 120 mph......@ 12+ sec. (n/m) - ZBlacktt 16:46:15 01/30/01 How can it have no traction?!?!?!?!?!? - NVMYZTT 17:53:24 01/30/01 You probably didnt have 530+RWHP>>>> - NONE 18:03:57 01/30/01 heh, take a look at my stg. 12+ that has all sortsa traction - Bernie 21:28:55 01/30/01 It's my Z NV, not their project car :) (n/m) - Good2Zya 19:09:22 01/30/01 MPH is the true measure of power. What was the speed trap? (n/m) - John Y(Houston) 16:43:49 01/30/01 not as much as some people think - Altered BeaZTT 17:00:06 01/30/01 Yep. - ZHOUND 17:14:59 01/30/01 YEP....I got - SteAmyZ(ztoyz.net©) 20:06:24 01/30/01 It ran a 122+ MPH (n/m) - Good2Zya 19:06:59 01/30/01 easy mid/low 11sec speed.your car is capable of 10's no prob - twinz 09:18:37 01/31/01 122.46mph. Not bad; for 539rwhp. (n/m) - teahead 11:42:59 01/31/01 That's my Z - Good2Zya 19:05:57 01/30/01 hey which issue is it in? i would love to see it >> - maverick (NYC) 09:17:41 01/31/01 From my experience...>>>>>>>>>>>>> - SpdRacr 19:15:01 01/30/01 Questions for Good2Zya and SpdRacr>>>>>> - NONE 19:28:31 01/30/01 Well........... - SpdRacr 19:40:59 01/30/01 Not incouraging but helpfull thanks. (n/m) - NONE 19:54:08 01/30/01 you might want to consider > - Kiwi_Z 20:18:17 01/30/01 Without SERIOUS rear end suspension work, Z's DO NOT hook up - BadZCar (FL) 21:47:50 01/30/01 Well, that's not quite true - Good2Zya 22:07:26 01/30/01 No mentioning of a clutch upgrade. It's probably an auto. - JamesPhotek (StL) 22:43:09 01/30/01 This Z, MY Z is a 5sp. And,if you would bother.. - Good2Zya 23:42:40 01/30/01 Re: This Z, MY Z is a 5sp. And,if you would bother.. - JamesPhotek (StL) 23:51:13 01/30/01 Very new to the forum ,,, I see,,LOL. (n/m) - ZBlacktt 09:05:52 01/31/01
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.